WordPress SEO agency
Your buyers ask ChatGPT for a recommendation in your category, and it names someone else. Install the Foliora plugin and it works the whole site — post and page metadata, the taxonomy underneath it, the schema an assistant needs to quote you, your robots rules and llms.txt — then writes what is missing. You approve every change before it publishes. From $199 per month.
Publishes through
Cited across
How it works
No audit deck, no strategy phase, no six-week onboarding. The first check costs an email address, and everything after it ends in a change that is live on your site.
Enter your domain — no install, no card. Foliora reads your public pages, checks your category in Google, and asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Grok for a recommendation in it. You get a score out of 100 and the names of the sites getting recommended instead of you.
Not just new posts. Foliora rewrites thin titles and descriptions, untangles the category and tag archives competing with each other, straightens canonicals and internal routes, repairs the article and FAQ schema an assistant needs to quote you, keeps robots and llms.txt correct, and writes the guides and comparisons that do not exist yet.
You see every change before it happens, then Foliora writes it through a scoped connection to your site — no theme edits, no FTP, no developer ticket. It re-reads the live page and puts the same questions back to the same assistants, so you see which change moved the score.
Two surfaces, one loop
Foliora scores a site out of 100 across four pillars, and the two heaviest are one per surface. A WordPress SEO agency that only works the Google half is leaving thirty points on the table.
Whether your category and buyer phrases return a page of yours at all, and how high. This is the classic work: taxonomy that is not competing with itself, canonicals, internal routes, and pages that deserve the position.
Whether ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Google AI Overviews name your site when someone asks a question in your category — and which sites get named in your place when they do not.
Whether one page clearly owns what you do, in enough depth and with the right schema for both a crawler and an assistant to understand it without guessing.
Whether the pages someone needs before deciding actually exist: category, how to choose, comparison, and FAQ. Missing pages are the most common reason an assistant cites someone else.
The connected work
Yoast and Rank Math give you the fields. What moves the number is deciding what belongs in them, which pages should exist at all, and whether the answer changed after you published.
Tie buyer demand to real posts, pages, categories, tags, and public custom types before proposing a change.
Rewrite thin or duplicated titles and descriptions, then resolve the archive sprawl, canonicals, redirects, and internal routes underneath them.
Ask a fixed set of buyer questions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and AI Overviews, and record whether your site is cited, mentioned, or ignored — plus the hosts named instead.
Write the page so an assistant can lift a clean, attributable answer from it: the question stated plainly, first-party evidence, author provenance, and no claim the site cannot support.
Keep article, author, breadcrumb, and FAQ structured data valid, robots rules correct, and llms.txt current, so an assistant can parse what you publish instead of inferring it.
Check the rendered page after the write succeeds, then re-run the Google check and the AI panel so the score moves on evidence rather than assumption.
What you get
Every engagement starts from the same snapshot and produces the same artifacts, so you can tell what was done and when.
What it costs
WordPress SEO agencies on this search result quote a retainer after a sales call. Ours is on the page, and the first snapshot costs an email address — no card, no charge.
The full loop on one domain: research, approve, publish, verify. Add capacity when you need it.
The boundary matters
Initial WordPress access stays on public content. Theme PHP, plugin installs, WooCommerce customer or order data, and claim-heavy changes remain explicitly approval-gated or out of the automatic execution boundary.
Questions buyers ask
The honest answer is that the plugin question is the smaller half. Yoast, Rank Math, and SEO Framework all set titles, descriptions, and schema competently, and any of them is fine. None of them decides which pages should exist, writes them, or tells you that ChatGPT recommends a competitor when someone asks about your category. That gap is the work, and it is what Foliora does.
You can keep them, and most sites do. Foliora reads whatever SEO plugin you already run and writes through it rather than fighting it, so your existing titles, descriptions, and schema settings stay where your team expects to find them. What changes is that something is now deciding what those fields should say, based on what buyers search for and what assistants currently answer instead.
No tool ships the work. Plugins can bulk-edit metadata, generate sitemaps, and flag broken links, and audit tools can list problems by the hundred, but neither writes the page that answers a buying question or checks whether an assistant changed its recommendation afterward. The bottleneck on most WordPress sites is unwritten pages and tangled taxonomy, which is a research and drafting problem rather than a tooling one.
Agency retainers on this search result generally start around $1,500 to $5,000 per month and are quoted only after a sales call. Foliora starts at $199 per month for one site, covering 25 tracked buyer questions, 3 approved changes shipped per month, 250 managed pages, weekly site checks, and monthly sampling across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Google AI Overviews. Larger sites move to $499 or $999. The first snapshot costs an email address.
It depends entirely on whether the service changes your site. Paying for a monthly ranking report is not worth it. Paying for pages that did not exist before, metadata that was thin and is now specific, and a record of which assistants started naming you is a different transaction. Run the free snapshot first — it tells you whether the problem is your Google foundation, your AI coverage, or both, before you spend anything.
Both, and that is the point. You install the plugin and Foliora makes the changes itself through a scoped connection to your site — post and page metadata, taxonomy structure, schema, redirects, new articles — so there is no audit deck to act on and no developer ticket to file. What an agency normally supplies, the research and the judgment about which change is worth making, is what the software runs. You stay the approver: nothing is written until you have read the specific change.
Most of the early work is on content that already exists. WordPress sites accumulate: thin post titles, duplicated category and tag archives competing with each other, canonicals pointing at the wrong version, old posts that should be consolidated or redirected. Foliora rewrites weak titles and descriptions, untangles the taxonomy, repairs article and FAQ schema so an assistant can quote the page, and keeps your robots rules and llms.txt current. New articles come after that, for the questions your archive cannot answer yet.
Answer engine optimization is the work of getting an assistant to name your site when someone asks it a question in your category, rather than naming a competitor or an aggregator. In practice it is less exotic than it sounds: state the question plainly on a page, answer it with first-party expertise, mark it up so the passage is attributable, and make sure the page exists at all. What differs is the measurement — instead of a ranking position, you check whether the assistant cited you.
They cite whoever answers the question clearly, and for most categories that is currently a large publisher, an aggregator, or a competitor's guide. Foliora samples a fixed panel of buyer questions across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, and Google AI Overviews, records which sites get named in your place, and treats those gaps as the page backlog. Nobody can promise a citation; what you get is the list of questions where you are losing one, and a page written to compete for it.
Not to start. The free snapshot reads only public pages and signs in to nothing. When you enable execution, Foliora connects through a scoped content API limited to public content types. Theme PHP, plugin installs, user data, and WooCommerce customer or order records stay outside the boundary entirely, and nothing is written to the live site until you approve the specific change.
Start with the public surface
Related: