AI search optimization agency
Google and the assistants read the same pages. Foliora drafts improvements on that one body of existing source material, and — after you approve — can publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read, then measure each surface separately. From $49.99 per month.
built for
cited across
3 moves
The free snapshot exists because most teams do not know which half is failing. Strong Google rankings with zero AI citations is common, and so is the reverse.
Give it a domain and nothing else — no install, no card — and Foliora checks what Google returns for your category while asking ChatGPT and Gemini what they recommend in it, then scores the two halves separately out of 100.
The foundation work and the answer work draw on the same existing pages. New pages stay behind your approval. Publishing goes through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after approval and a remote re-read.
Approval is what counts against the monthly change limit. Foliora can then publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read, verify the rendered page, re-run the Google check, and re-ask the same questions.
connected work
The useful unit is a connected initiative: a question, the evidence, a reviewable proposal, an approved change, and — when you connect a publisher — a verified result and a dated observation. Anything that breaks that chain is a report.
Audit whether important pages are crawlable, indexable, canonical, rendered, and internally linked, then route approved corrections through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, a GitHub pull request, manual application, or a customer-owned agent through MCP.
Map search demand, buyer questions, current results, cited sources, and the gaps the business can credibly fill.
Turn real expertise into definitions, guides, comparisons, specifications, and examples drafted onto pages that already exist.
Preserve the exact change, rationale, source, affected resource, risk class, and approval version.
On Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request, write the approved change after a remote re-read, instead of separating strategy from implementation.
Read AI citation samples beside the dated initiative history — which page changed, when it was approved, and what the same questions returned afterward.
essential · $49.99/mo
Ours is on the page, and the first snapshot costs an email address — no card, no charge.
Keep improving every month.
boundary
Foliora preserves the underlying prompts, responses, citations, queries, pages, and approved changes so customers can inspect movement instead of trusting an unexplained number. Publishing goes through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request. New pages, JSON-LD, canonicals, and redirects stay behind the same approval.
questions
It is a service that treats Google results and AI answers as one problem instead of two. The same technical foundation and the same body of first-party evidence determine whether you rank and whether an assistant names you, so the work is done once on your own pages and measured on every surface separately. The alternative — an SEO retainer plus a separate AI visibility tool — pays twice and connects nothing.
Two differences. An SEO agency generally measures ranked positions and hands you recommendations to implement; Foliora also samples what ChatGPT and Gemini return, and can write the approved change through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read. If you skip a publisher, you still get the exact approved diff. What stays the same is that a human approves everything before any write.
Essential is $49.99 per site per month for monthly research and improvements. Pro is $149.99 per site per month for weekly checks and improvements. Both include supported drafts, customer approval, publishing, and live verification. Annual billing saves 20%.
Google, plus ChatGPT and Gemini. Every AI observation is stored with its engine, prompt, market, and date, because the same question returns different sources on different days and a single screenshot proves nothing.
Usually not, and it works better when it does not. Foliora handles the repetitive half — finding the gaps, drafting changes on existing pages, writing your own domain after approval, verifying that write, re-asking the questions — which is the part that stalls when everyone is busy. Positioning, brand, campaigns, and anything requiring interviews or regulated claims stay with people.
No, on either surface. Google's algorithm and each model's output are both outside anyone's control, ours included. The offer is narrower and more useful than a guarantee: a dated list of where someone else currently wins the position or the citation, an approved draft on an existing page built to compete for it, and a re-check on both surfaces so you can inspect what actually moved.
preview
Prefer the field guide? Measure AI visibility with source evidence
Related: