Log inPreview your site
Sampled: ChatGPT · Gemini · monthlyReceipts kept · unsampled ≠ absentYou approve every change — verified live

Otterly.AI alternative

Otterly issues recommendations on a prompt list. Foliora derives the questions, joins the evidence, and drafts the change.

Otterly.AI is the cheapest published entry into AI search monitoring, and its units are prompts tracked, URLs audited, and recommendations issued. Foliora derives buyer questions from the catalog, samples ChatGPT and Gemini — Gemini is an Otterly add-on — then counts the approved change. Foliora can then publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read and re-ask. $49.99 per month. A recommendation feed is not the operating model for a staffed team.

publishes through

cited across

$49.99/mopublished, no sales callChatGPT + Geminiincluded, not add-onsApproved improvementsyour approval, verified live

side by side

Recommendations issued, against changes you approve.

Both columns are published self-serve pricing. The useful fact is not that the entry numbers sit one cent apart — it is what each dollar buys.

Otterly.AIFoliora
Published entry price$29/mo Lite$49.99/mo
How the vendor describes itselfContent intelligence platformManaged AI search
Prompts or questions measured15 Lite, 100 Standard, 400 PremiumBuyer questions derived from your business
Sampling frequencyDailyMonthly on Essential; weekly on Pro
Engines included4, plus 3 as paid add-onsChatGPT and Gemini
Claude and GeminiPaid add-onsGemini included; Claude is not sampled
SeatsUnlimitedNot sold
Unit of outputRecommendations, 3/week on LiteApproved changes, 3/month
Writes the change into the pageNot described on the pricing pageYes, as a reviewable draft
Publishes to your siteNot described on the pricing pageMapped Shopify Online Store pages
Live page re-read after publishingNot described on the pricing pageYes, and the receipt is retained
Technical page audits1,000 to 10,000 URLs/monthMonthly or weekly review, then approved improvements
Share of voiceCitation analysisCited, mentioned, or absent, with competing hosts
API and MCP accessStandard tier and aboveMCP for customer-owned agents
Higher capacity publishedYes, Enterprise from $1,000/moMonthly on Essential ($49.99/site); weekly on Pro ($149.99/site). Both include supported drafts, approval, publishing, and verification. Save 20% annually.

The Otterly.AI column is taken from otterly.ai/pricing as read on August 23, 2026, including their listing of Claude, Google Gemini, and Google AI Mode as paid add-on engines. Vendor pricing changes; check their page before deciding. "Not described on the pricing page" is an absence from their published feature list, not a claim about what the product can do. The Foliora column is our own pricing page.

ahead

Gemini is included. The questions are derived. The page ships.

From otterly.ai's own pricing and features pages, read August 2026. Lite is $29 and the cheapest published monitor we list. Foliora is $49.99. Claude and Gemini are add-ons on their side of the table, and recommendations are not an operating model for a staffed team.

what otterly.ai uniquely publishes

The lowest monitoring price, more seats, and Looker.

On price per prompt this is not a close contest. Those are real remaining differences. They are not Foliora skipping ChatGPT or Gemini, or citation reporting, and they are not a reason for a staffed team to treat recommendations as the operating model.

the difference

The cheapest monitor is still a monitor.

For $29 a month Otterly will issue recommendations and audit URLs, and that price is real. Foliora is $49.99 because the questions are derived from the catalog, ChatGPT and Gemini are on the plan, the evidence is joined, and the deliverable is the rewritten page on your domain plus a re-check — not another list for a team that already has too many.

Unlimited recommendations are how a backlog is born

Otterly's Lite tier lists three recommendations per week and the tiers above list unlimited. Their GEO audit will tell you which of your pages an AI crawler cannot properly read, and that check is real. The failure mode is not the tool. It is the unjoined queue. A sophisticated marketing team can already produce more recommendations than it can rank across crawl, demand, and live citation outcome; unlimited recs make that worse.

Foliora runs the same class of technical check weekly, then ranks the fix against the rest of the evidence and writes it. Last quarter's unshipped recommendations are usually a synthesis failure, not proof that the team needed a cheaper monitor.

Add-on engines are real money

Otterly's four included engines are ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot. Their pricing page lists Claude, Google Gemini, and Google AI Mode as separately priced add-ons, scaling with the tier you are on.

This is disclosed clearly on their own page and it is a defensible way to price, since each engine costs them something to sample. Foliora includes Gemini on the base plan rather than selling it as an add-on. Extra engines (Perplexity, Claude, Grok) are not on the default paid panel.

The panel is derived. The audit volume is not the product

We sample globally on a smaller question set derived from the catalog, and we spend the difference on the analysis and the work. Foliora reads your whole catalog within the crawl budget, finds the specific page that should own each question, writes the change, and shows it to you as a diff with the buyer question and evidence attached.

On Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request, approved work may publish after a remote re-read. Then the rendered page is re-read, because a successful API call is not evidence that a page is correct, and the questions that named a competitor are asked again and dated. GEO audit volume across thousands of URLs is a remaining difference of theirs. It is not a ranked change on the live domain.

  • Questions generated from your catalog, not typed in by you
  • Existing pages restructured, not just new ones written
  • Every observation stored with engine, question, date, citation URLs, and outcome

A staffed team still does not have the join

If last quarter's recommendations already shipped, you still do not have a system that derived the questions from the crawl and ranked one page change from templates, global demand, and live citation outcome together. Otterly will keep naming pages from a list that was never joined to the rest of the evidence. Shipping those items faster does not produce that ranking.

Foliora is the operator that does the analysis most advanced teams do not join, then drafts the approved change and — on Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request — may write and re-measure. A tracker plus a large team is how a backlog of unjoined recommendations accumulates, which is why the staffed team is the buyer who needs this most.

read skeptically

We sell one of the two products on this page.

Everything above about Otterly.AI comes from their own public pages, dated where it matters, and we have linked the method we used so you can redo it. The tinted section is what Foliora ships that they do not. The section after it is what they uniquely publish — remaining differences, not fake losses. Run the eight-criterion check yourself before you buy either one.

questions

Foliora and Otterly.AI, answered.

Otterly Lite at $29 per month is the lowest published monitoring entry we have found in this category, and that price is a real remaining difference of one cent against Foliora's $49.99 base. It is not the stronger operating model. Foliora derives buyer questions from the catalog, samples ChatGPT and Gemini — Gemini is an Otterly add-on — joins that panel with demand and on-site findings, then drafts the change on an existing page. Customer approval is required before publication. Foliora can then publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read and re-ask. A recommendation feed is how serious teams accumulate a backlog.

Otterly's published tiers meter search prompts, GEO URL audits, and recommendations — three per week on Lite, unlimited from Standard up. Foliora includes supported drafts without a monthly generation allowance, with a monthly Essential cycle or a weekly Pro cycle. A recommendation and an approved change are different deliverables. The purchase is whether you want another dashboard over prompts you maintain, or a derived panel that joins crawl, demand, and live citation outcome and drafts the page.

Not if you are buying monitoring only. Otterly's Lite plan is $29 per month according to their pricing page in August 2026, against Foliora at $49.99. Otterly also includes unlimited team members on every tier; Foliora does not sell seats. The comparison is not the monthly number. Foliora includes Gemini — a paid add-on on Otterly — and the analysis that ranks one page change from joined sources rather than issuing another recommendation.

Their pricing page lists four engines included on every tier — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot — with Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Mode available as paid add-ons priced per tier. Their marketing describes seven engines in total, which is accurate once the add-ons are counted. Foliora includes ChatGPT and Gemini, with no engine add-on line. Google AI Mode is the Otterly add-on Foliora does not sample.

Otterly's GEO Audit checks whether AI crawlers can reach and extract a page: crawlability, whether content is present without JavaScript, structured data, and on-page factors, scored per URL, with a large monthly URL allowance. Foliora runs the equivalent technical checks on the site’s monthly or weekly cycle — robots, extractability, schema, blocked or orphaned URLs — and then does the thing an audit cannot: ranks the fix against the rest of the evidence and drafts it. Customer approval is required before publication. Foliora can then publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read. If you want audit volume across thousands of URLs as a standalone report, Otterly sells more of that per dollar. Volume of audited URLs is not a ranked page change.

Otterly runs an agency partner program with unlimited client workspaces, extra prompts, pitch workspaces for prospects, and white-labeled Looker reporting, layered on their Standard or Premium plans. That is a well-built agency offer for reporting and pitching, and it is a remaining difference. Each Foliora site selects Essential at $49.99 per month or Pro at $149.99 per month, managed from one account. An agency that only files recommendations still leaves the join and the page with the client. Foliora is the operating loop, not a reporting add-on you keep Otterly to run.

You can keep Otterly as optional independent measurement — at $29 a month it is inexpensive as a check. Foliora stores every observation with the engine, question, date, full response, citation URLs, and citation outcome specifically so a second tool can be used to audit us. That is not the recommended architecture. The operating model is the derived panel, the join, and the approved change.

preview

See which questions name someone else today.

How we evaluate tools in our own category: the eight-criterion method.

Related: Peec AI alternative · Scrunch AI alternative · AI brand monitoring · Why 25 questions

Preview your site