Log inPreview your site
Sampled: ChatGPT · Gemini · monthlyReceipts kept · unsampled ≠ absentYou approve every change — verified live

Peec AI alternative

Peec stops where the analytics end. Foliora already measures citation outcome — then joins the evidence and drafts the change.

Peec's own documentation describes it as the analytics layer that measures AI visibility and turns it into prioritized actions, and states that it does not write or publish content itself. Foliora already records citation outcome, competing hosts, and the stored response, joins that reading with the crawl and global demand, drafts the change, and shows you the diff. Customer approval is required before publication. Foliora can then publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read and re-ask. A team with writers still does not have that join.

Preview your site See pricing

publishes through

cited across

$49.99/mopublished, no sales callChatGPT + Gemininot a pick-threeApproved improvementsyour approval, verified live

side by side

Analytics that stop at the report, against measurement that ranks and ships.

These two products overlap on observation. Foliora already records citation outcome; the split is whether that reading is joined to the rest of the evidence and whether your own page actually changes.

Peec AIFoliora
Published entry price$95/mo Starter$49.99/mo
How the vendor describes itselfAI search analyticsManaged AI search
Prompts or questions measured50 Starter, 150 Pro, 350 AdvancedBuyer questions derived from your business
Sampling frequencyDailyMonthly on Essential; weekly on Pro
Engines on the entry tierChoose 3 of 6ChatGPT and Gemini
Share of voiceSentiment, position, and SOVCited, mentioned, or absent, with competing hosts
SeatsUnlimitedNot sold
Writes the contentNo, by their own statementYes, as a reviewable draft
Publishes to your siteNo, by their own statementMapped Shopify Online Store pages
Approval gate before publishingNot applicableYes, bound to that exact version
Live page re-read after publishingNot applicableYes, and the receipt is retained
Question re-asked after the changeContinuous daily trackingRe-asked and dated against the change
Observation exportCSV, Looker Studio, MCPMCP for customer-owned agents; full response, engine, date, citations
Off-site recommendationsEditorial, directories, UGC, ownedOwned pages only

The Peec AI column is taken from peec.ai/pricing and Peec's own published product documentation as read on August 23, 2026, including their statement that Peec does not write or publish content itself. Vendor pricing and features change; check their pages before deciding. The Foliora column is our own pricing page.

ahead

They stop at analytics. We already include that measurement, then join it and publish.

Taken from Peec's own pricing and documentation pages, read August 2026. They publish an unusually candid fact sheet, including the line that they do not write or publish content. That candor is useful. It is not a purchase recommendation. Foliora already records the citation outcome, then does the analysis a tracker export does not.

what peec ai uniquely publishes

More seats, more engines, and off-site work we do not do.

The remaining published differences are seats, Looker Studio, shopping-price quotes, Google AI Mode, and recommendations outside your domain — not ChatGPT or Gemini Foliora skips, and not citation outcome we fail to record.

the difference

Candor about stopping at analytics is not a reason to stop there.

Peec measures visibility, surfaces sources, and says plainly it does not write or publish. Foliora records the same class of citation outcome, joins it with the crawl and global demand, then ships a diff you approve onto your domain and reads the live page back. A staffed team still does not have that synthesis sitting in one system.

Writers do not replace the join

Peec AI is not a worse version of Foliora, and Foliora is not a more expensive Peec. Their own documentation draws the line: Peec measures visibility and surfaces the sources most likely to move it, and does not write or publish content. That is a product boundary they state honestly.

The purchase is still Foliora. Foliora already records cited, mentioned, or absent, with competing hosts and the stored response — the measurement a second dashboard would duplicate — then ranks the owned-page change from the crawl, demand, and live panel together. A team with writers and a publishing process still does not have that multi-source analysis.

We take their objection to generated content seriously

Peec argues that AI-written content carries sourcing, expertise, and uniqueness risk and needs human oversight. That is not vendor positioning, it is correct, and it is the strongest argument they make on this page.

Our answer is structural rather than reassuring. No draft reaches your site without a person approving that exact version. Every proposal carries the buyer question, the source, the affected resource, and a named risk class. Consequential, comparative, and regulated claims are gated explicitly. The previous state is snapshotted before anything is written, so a change can be reversed.

  • Approval binds to a specific version, not to a general permission
  • Evidence and buyer question travel with every proposal
  • The prior state is retained so any change can be rolled back

Four places to act, and owned pages are the durable lever

Peec sorts its recommendations by where the work happens: your own pages, editorial coverage, reference sites, and community forums. That taxonomy is genuinely useful and we will happily borrow the framing.

Foliora operates in the first bucket only. We write and publish Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or GitHub. We do not pitch journalists, claim directory listings, or post in communities on your behalf. Off-site PR is a different purchase, not a reason to skip Foliora.

What the price difference actually buys

Peec Starter is $95 per month and Foliora is $49.99. Theirs is broader on seats and optional engines. Ours includes ChatGPT and Gemini, live search demand data, the ranking across those layers, and the published page on your domain.

That ranking is reading your catalog, joining it with demand and live citation outcome, finding the specific page that should own each question, writing the change, presenting it as a reviewable diff, publishing it after a remote re-read, confirming the rendered result on the live URL, and re-asking the questions afterward. A team that would write the paragraph themselves still does not have the analysis that decided which paragraph.

read skeptically

We sell one of the two products on this page.

Everything above about Peec AI comes from their own public pages, dated where it matters, and we have linked the method we used so you can redo it. The tinted section is what Foliora ships that they do not. The section after it is what they uniquely publish — remaining differences, not fake losses. Run the eight-criterion check yourself before you buy either one.

questions

Foliora and Peec AI, answered.

Peec AI is unusually clear about what it is, which makes this easier to answer than most comparisons. Their own documentation states that Peec is the analytics layer that measures AI visibility and does not write or publish content itself. That candor is useful, and it is not a reason to stop at analytics because you already have writers. Foliora already includes the measurement Peec is known for — citation outcome, competing hosts, and the stored response — then joins it with the crawl, live search demand and competing SERP evidence, and on-site findings, ranks the owned-page change, and drafts it. Customer approval is required before publication. Foliora can then publish through Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request after a remote re-read and re-ask. A team with writers still does not have that join.

Peec measures visibility and issues prioritized recommendations you execute. Foliora already records cited, mentioned, or absent, with competing hosts and the stored response, then joins those readings with the site model and global demand, drafts, publishes on your domain, and re-checks. Peec's own product description ends at prioritized actions grouped by where to act — your own pages, editorial coverage, reference sites, and communities. Foliora ranks the first of those four from evidence a tracker export does not join.

Their argument is a good one and worth stating properly: AI-generated content carries sourcing, expertise, and uniqueness risk, and it needs human oversight. We agree with all of that, which is why the oversight is the product rather than a disclaimer on it. Nothing Foliora writes reaches your site without a person approving that exact version. Every proposal carries the buyer question it answers, the source it draws on, and the resource it changes. Consequential, comparative, and regulated claims stay behind explicit approval. The risk Peec names is real; the answer to it is an approval gate and an audit trail, not abstinence from the analysis.

Yes, on the published entry prices. Peec's published Starter plan is $95 per month for 50 prompts on one project, according to their pricing page in August 2026, against Foliora at $49.99 per month. Peec includes unlimited user seats on every tier; Foliora does not sell seats. The Foliora purchase is ChatGPT and Gemini, live search demand data, the multi-source ranking that decides which page to change, and the drafting, approval, publish, and post-publication verification.

Peec's own pages list six engines available by default — ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Perplexity, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot — with self-serve tiers choosing three of them. Foliora samples ChatGPT and Gemini, then — on Shopify, WordPress, Webflow, or a GitHub pull request — may write the approved change after a remote re-read. They cover Google AI Mode; we do not. Foliora stores the engine, question, and date on every observation.

Yes, as a categorized recommendation list: Peec describes classifying cited sources into editorial, corporate, user-generated, reference, and your own website, with a gap analysis showing where competitors are cited and you are not, and prioritized actions grouped by which of those four places to act in. That is diagnosis without the join. Foliora already records citation outcome and competing hosts, then ranks the owned-page change against the crawl and demand, writes it, publishes on approval, and re-asks.

You can keep Peec as optional independent measurement. Peec has unlimited seats, Google AI Mode, and off-site recommendations Foliora does not make. Those are remaining differences, not a reason to make Peec the operating system. Foliora already samples ChatGPT and Gemini and records cited, mentioned, or absent. Press, directories, and communities remain a separate purchase — PR work Foliora does not do.

preview

See which questions name someone else today.

How we evaluate tools in our own category: the eight-criterion method.

Related: Profound alternative · Otterly.AI alternative · AI brand monitoring · Why 25 questions

Preview your site